We certainly prefer our doctors to update their priors based on new medical evidence, why should we not prefer that of our politicians as well?
We certainly prefer our doctors to update their priors based on new medical evidence, why should we not prefer that of our politicians as well?
Exposure to alternative ideas in our society and in our individual lives to either reaffirm or reevaluate our faiths is an absolute necessity in civil society.
What I will absolutely not accept is if the government does not take responsibility for its own actions towards achieving fiscal consolidation as well which is, after all, the objective of these measures.
it might alter behavior, it might be more politically supportable and it might better target those who need the handouts. As is common in most policy debates, the answer is, “Not so fast.”
The most common argument against the GST is that it is a regressive tax and so, will harm the low-income more than the middle-income more than the high-income. I think this argument is incredibly naïve.
I sincerely believe that a sound mathematical education is one of the keys to a mature (Malaysian or anywhere really) civil society.
What if, regardless of whatever a given country, call it country M, is doing right now, country M cannot escape the middle income trap because it is at its middle-income equilibrium?
I am somewhat puzzled and concerned over the absence of any mention of improving economic realities in the fight against crime.
The 13th General Elections is a wathershed of sorts as elections tend to be, and we would like to share some common views of how we move forward from here.
there is a lack of faith in official statistics. A question to ask is therefore what is really at stake from society's perspective when official statistics are believed to be fallacious?
after the subprime crisis in the United States and the ongoing Eurozone crisis, questions have been raised on the efficacy and value of capitalism as the world’s economic system.